SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
News

AMENDMENT 4 FIGHT NOW IN CYBERSPACE

By: John Kennedy
Source: The News Service of Florida
Date: September 9, 2010
THE CAPITAL, TALLAHASSEE, Sept. 9, 2010…Backers of a constitutional amendment that would put land-use changes before voters began airing a tough-toned web advertisement that says the measure is needed because Florida leads the nation in corruption among public officials. The spot features photos of at least a dozen city and county officials charged in recent years with criminal misconduct, including two former Democratic state legislators - Ray Liberty of West Palm Beach and Joe Eggelletion of Lauderdale Lakes. The ad concludes Amendment 4 is needed because “our homes and communities are too important to leave in the hands of crooked politicians.” “Money is tight in this campaign,” acknowledged Wayne Garcia, spokesman for the Hometown Democracy campaign, which is pushing the November ballot proposal. “But we certainly have further use of this ad in mind.” The web ad was released within days of Hometown Democracy opponents posting a spot of their own
Categories: In the News

Voters didn't understand tax abatement referendum? Expect more of same if Amendment 4 passes

By: Rich Campbell
Source: TC Palm
Date: September 6, 2010
There’s an interesting argument circulating in Martin County to explain the passage of the tax abatement referendum. “I think that no one understood what they were voting on,” said County Commissioner Sarah Heard. “It was extremely confusing, and there’s still a legal challenge to that.” Voters didn’t understand the referendum? And this is the reason, according to Heard, why it was approved? I grant the possibility. But I also find this argument to be highly disingenuous coming from Heard and others who opposed the referendum. After all, these are the same folks championing Amendment 4, the proposed constitutional amendment that would give voters the right to reject or accept comprehensive plan amendments approved by local governments. If voters didn’t — or couldn’t — understand the tax abatement referendum, what hope is there they will be able to understand equally esoteric ballot measures on comprehensive plan amendments? Do you see the inconsistency?
Categories: In the News

Amendment 4 promises budget-busting chaos

By: Ed Chase
Source: Palm Beach Post
Date: September 6, 2010
There's been much debate about Amendment 4 and its negative impact on Florida's economy. This amendment, deceptively known as "Hometown Democracy," would be bad just for local business. It also would be bad for our local communities. Palm Beach County's comprehensive plan and land-use designations are revised over time as the needs of our community and residents change. This amendment would force citizens to vote each time a development request or county comprehensive plan change is submitted, at a budget-busting cost to taxpayers.
Categories: In the News

Amendment 4's Hidden Danger #1

By: Kevin Hing
Date: September 4, 2010
Amendment 4's Hidden Danger #1: It's Impossible to Create a "Lawyer-Proof" Ballot Summary that Describes a Comprehensive Plan in 75 Words or Less. Florida Amendment 4 (also known as "Hometown Democracy") seeks to give Floridians a final referendum vote on all comprehensive plan changes. It may seem like a good idea to folks who are frustrated with sprawl and overdevelopment, but voting for it is like bringing a piece of furniture into your home that looks nice but is infested with bedbugs...it's full of hidden dangers that can make your home and town unliveable and are very difficult to exterminate once in place.
Categories: Blogs

On September 2, 2010, Hometown Democracy founder Leslie Blackner and communications director Wayne Garcia appeared on Rob Lorei's Radioactivity Live Call-In Show on Tampa's WMNF (88.5 FM) to discuss Amendment 4. No opponents of Amendment 4 were included in the discussion, which is very unfortunate, because during the course of the interview a number of completely false claims were made by the Hometown Democracy folks, and nobody was there to set the record straight for the benefit of Mr. Lorei's listeners.
Categories: Blogs

Vote No on 4’s Houck speaks out

By: Kevin Gale
Source: South Florida Business Journal
Date: August 31, 2010
Ryan Houck, who is leading the fight against the proposed Amendment 4 to the Florida constitution, is very adamant that the measure would create lengthy ballots. Houck called me after last week's blog about an e-mail sent by his political action committee, Vote No on 4. The e-mail described a 47-page sample ballot that was given to voters outside some polling places to show how Amendment 4 could create ballots that are filled with the minutiae of land use decisions. See the sample ballot here.
Categories: In the News

Be careful what you wish for

By: Robert Widmar
Source: Hernando Today
Date: August 29, 2010
In their recent articles on Hometown Democracy, both Ron Rae of the Hernando Today and Dan DeWitt of the Hernando Times endorsed the passage of Amendment 4 in the November election. Their recommendation was based on a need to slow down (stop?) development because of the amount of property already approved but as yet unbuilt that lies ready for an economic recovery. Planners and commissioners had already decided these were the best land uses for the properties. They were carefully planned, guarded by multiple performance conditions and development agreements that required development to pay for the needed infrastructure improvements that their plans specified.
Categories: In the News

Amendment 4: A gamble Florida can't afford to take

By: Abel Harding
Source: Florida Times-Union
Date: August 29, 2010
There are ways to get Florida’s economy back on track, but grinding future development to a halt isn’t one of them. Yet, that’s exactly what Amendment 4, the proposed constitutional amendment commonly billed as “hometown democracy,” would do. Florida’s had some doozies over the years, but this one’s in a league of its own. Fact and fiction have flown fast and furious, but while some outcomes remain unclear, there are some certainties.
Categories: In the News

Letter: Amendment 4 would result on costly red tape, obstruct progress

Source: TC Palm
Date: August 27, 2010
Ian Pollock’s Aug. 22 letter could not be more misguided. Amendment 4 is not a solution to corruption or growth management challenges. It’s a special-interest boondoggle written and funded by a land-use attorney. It would require a taxpayer-funded referendum for every single change to our local growth plan. It’s so extreme it doesn’t even provide exceptions for hospitals, police stations, or schools — delaying these necessary public projects by years and burning up taxpayer dollars.
Categories: In the News

Vice Mayor Jim Parent Triumphs Over Ruttencutter Attacks in Amendment 4 / St. Pete Beach Exchange

By: Guest Blog: Kevin Hing
Source: St. Pete Beach & Hometown Democracy/Amendment 4
Date: August 22, 2010
St. Pete Beach Vice Mayor Jim Parent's outspoken opposition to Amendment 4 recently drew hostile fire from not one, but two of the city's former vice mayors: Harry Metz and Ed Ruttencutter.
Categories: Blogs

Helping to Stop Admendment 4